Analysis Of The Poem Persimmons By Li- Young Lee

Li- Young Lee, â€Å"Persimmons† Analysis. The poem â€Å"Persimmons† by Li- Young Lee tells the story about the poet’s life, flashing back to his early childhood and adulthood having trouble adjusting to the English language. English was not his first language, which caused more confusion than understanding of new words. Persimmons shows how words can mean different things, but also how when someone truly loves you, some opposite words can have the same meaning. The poet is bashed by his sixth-grade teacher Mrs. Walker, but with the help of his mother and father he can overcome English boundaries and gain knowledge through their love. Persimmons is a free verse lyric poem from which the poet himself tells the story.†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"I part her legs, remember to tell her she is beautiful as the moon.† (26-28) In stanza four the poet is flashing back to his childhood and telling us some other words that he got in trouble for. â€Å"Other words that got me into trouble were fight and fright, wren and yarn.† (29-31) Even though he got in trouble by his teacher for not knowing the words, his mother helped him understand them in a different way. â€Å"Wren are small, plain birds.† (34) â€Å"My mother made birds out of yarn.† (37) Here he is shown how two different things can become the same thing. In stanza seven, Mrs. Walker has brought a persimmon to class. She cuts it up but the poet can clearly see that it isn’t ripe, so he doesn’t eat any. In the moment, he has more knowledge of the persimmon than his classmates and his teacher. Mrs. Walker calls it â€Å"a Chinese apple.† (43) She is attempting to take something that is not predominantly American, nor does it even look like an apple but labels it the same way. To the poet this is insulting because as we learned in stanza two, the art of the persimmon is much more deep to him and his culture. â€Å"My mother said that eve ry persimmon has a sun inside, something golden, glowing, warm as my face.† (46-48) The following stanza nine, the poet has found two persimmons wrapped in newspaper in the cellar. He takes them and puts them in his windowsill to ripen. Again, the persimmons are an important symbol because in stanzaShow MoreRelatedLiterary Analysis Of Persimmons1341 Words   |  6 Pages In Li-Young Lee’s poem, Persimmons, he tells the story of the speaker in an episodic manner to convey how the chapters of life are intertwined and the impact they all have on one another. This is a free verse poem and lends itself to the assumption of being autobiographical. It begins with the speaker in sixth grade being lectured by his teacher for not knowing the difference between â€Å"persimmon† and â€Å"precision.† It sharply transitions into discussing the art of eating a persimmon. The poem thenRead More Analysis of Li-Young Lee’s Persimmons Essay852 Words   |  4 Pages Analysis of Li-Young Lee’s Persimmons The speaker in Li-Young Lee’s poem â€Å"Persimmons† has been clearly raised in a bi-lingual, bi-cultural atmosphere. His experiences, although not entirely positive, have helped him grow into the man he is today. By using sensory imagery and â€Å"precise† diction along with the informal stanza structure, the speaker shows the reader that, despite his bi-cultural past, he now has realized, thanks to his experiences, that some of the most important things are notRead MoreConfucianism in Journey to the West31834 Words   |  128 PagesUniversity of Leiden 14 June 2012 Department: Language and Culture of China Course: Visual Political Communication (BA3) Semester: Summer Semester 2011/2012 Lecturer: Florian Schneider Journey to the West A Textual-Visual Discourse Analysis Name: Stefan Ruijsch (Student No. 0620203) Major: Chinese Studies, BA 3 E-mail: s.ruijsch@umail.leidenuniv.nl Phone: 06-48369645 Address: Vrijheidslaan 256, 2321 DP Leiden Word Count: 9,387 Table of Contents page

The Napster and Grokster Cases Differences and Similarities

Along with the development of a file format (MP3) to store digital audio recordings, came one of the new millennium’s most continuous debates – peer-to-peer piracy – file sharing. Internet companies such as Napster and Grokster became involved in notable legal cases in regards to copyright laws in cyberspace. These two cases are similar in nature, yet decidedly different. In order to understand the differences and similarities, one should have an understanding of each case as well as the court’s ruling. According to the text A Gift of Fire, Napster â€Å"opened on the Web in 1999 as a service that allowed its users to copy songs in MP3 files from the hard disks of other users† (Baase, 2013, p. 192, Section 4.1.6 Sharing Music: The†¦show more content†¦Louis School of Law, â€Å"Washington Law Blog†, Case Study: A M Records v. Napster, Inc., para. 1). Napster did not stay in business long after the higher courts ruling. This case was quickly followed by another well-know copyright infringement through free software situation. As John Zelezny’s text, Communications Law: Liberties, Restraints, and the Modern Media, notes, â€Å"two companies, Grokster and StreamCast Networks, distributed free software that allowed users to share digital files through peer-to-peer networks where personal computers communicated directly with each other and not through a central service† (Communications Law: Liberties, Restraints and the Modern Media, 2011, p. 360). The entertainment industry expressed its displeasure when Metro-Goldwyn Mayer (MGM) and â€Å"other film studios, songwriters, music publishers and recording companies filed suit against both Grokster and the StreamCast Network† (Communications Law: Liberties, Restraints and the Modern Media, 2011, p. 360). This landmark case made its way to the hallowed halls of the United States Supreme Court after the higher court granted review of the lower federal courts decision to side with the defendants (Grokster and StreamCast). Thus was born the case MGM v. Grokster, 545 U.S. 913 (2005). The Supreme Court under began hearing arguments in this case inShow MoreRelatedMarketing and E-commerce Business65852 Words   |  264 PagesListing of Chapter Opening Cases, Insight Cases, E-commerce in Action Cases, and Case Studies CHAPTER 1 THE REVOLUTION IS JUST BEGINNING Opening Case: Pinterest: A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words Insight on Technology: Will Apps Make the Web Irrelevant? Insight on Business: Start-Up Boot Camp Insight on Society: Facebook and the Age of Privacy Case Study: The Pirate Bay: Searching for a Safe Haven CHAPTER 2 E-COMMERCE BUSINESS MODELS AND CONCEPTS Opening Case: Twitter’s Business Model

Why Did Japan Attack Pearl Harbor free essay sample

Many hypotheses and theories exist for why that fateful day occurred in history. Was Japan trying to take over the world and the United States stood in their way? Did we deserve this? I believe Japan attacked Pearl Harbor for a combination of reasons. War is never simple and I have to believe that it is never just the fault of one. I believe that the combination of a breakdown of relations with the US, Japan’s imperialistic actions, and the US’s restriction on trade with Japan lit the fuse that resulted in the bombing of Pearl Harbor. I believe a breakdown of relations between the US and Japan was a contributing factor to the bombing of Pearl Harbor. In 1919 world leaders met to form a League of Nations to solve the world’s problems, however the United States failed to join. Some American leaders did not want to get involved with the problems of the world. We will write a custom essay sample on Why Did Japan Attack Pearl Harbor? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This shocked and disappointed some of Japan’s leaders. Further, in 1924 the US passed The Immigration Quota Act. This act affected much more than just Japan; it affected immigrants coming from eastern and southern Europe, India, and China. The Japanese wrote back in a newspaper article about this new act and how they were humiliated by it. â€Å"There is no denying that the adoption by the American Senate of the exclusion amendment to the Immigration bill has given a shock to the whole Japanese race such as has never before been felt†¦. The Senate has passed, with an almost overwhelming majority, an amendment they know is a most humiliating one to the Japanese race. † This amendment offended the Japanese and placed a barrier on already strained relations with the US. I believe another contributing factor to the bombing of Pearl Harbor was Japan’s imperialistic actions. Japan was becoming an aggressor. In 1932 Japan created a puppet state in Manchuria which caused conflict with China. After leaving the League of Nations, in 1937 Japan invaded China. Though small they were quickly establishing themselves as a concern to the US. To further aggravate an already unsteady situation, in September 1940, Japan signed a three-way pact with Nazi Germany and Italy. The US could not afford to fight a war on two fronts. I believe the final contributing factor was the US’s restriction on trade with Japan. In 1939, the US restricted the trade of aircraft and aircraft parts to Japan. In 1941, the US stopped all trade of oil, steel, and scrap iron. Japan feared that in two years they would have no petroleum for their military and their ships would stop moving. Japan further feared that, without action, a strengthening of American defenses in the South Pacific and an expansion of the American fleet would cause Japan to become a third class nation. Earlier, in 1940, the US had taken precautious measures and moved its fleet from California to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, the closest American territory to Japan at that time. In July of the same year, Congress passed the Naval Expansion Act which promised the fleet would triple by 1944. A year later the US temporarily stopped all the Japanese bank accounts and by August, stopped the trade of oil. I believe that the combination of a breakdown of relations with the US, Japan’s imperialistic actions, and the US’s restriction on trade with Japan lit the fuse that resulted in the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Would the outcome have been different if just one of these factors not occurred; or would war have still been inevitable? I can only hope that we have learned from the mistakes of the past so that we can avoid another fateful day in our future.

Julius Essays (1347 words) - Ancient Rome, 1st Millennium BC

Julius Caesar Julius Caesar, a Roman general and statesman, laid the foundations of the Roman imperial system. Born in Rome on July 12 or 13, 100 BC, Caesar belonged to the prestigious Julian clan; yet from early childhood he knew controversy. His uncle by marriage was Gaius Marius, leader of the Populares. This party supported agrarian reform and was opposed by the reactionary Optimates, a senatorial faction. Marius was seven times consul (chief magistrate), and the last year he held office, just before his death in 86 BC, he exacted a terrifying toll on the Optimates. At the same time he saw to it that young Caesar was appointed flamen dialis, one of an archaic priesthood with no power. This identified him with his uncle's extremist politics, and his marriage in 84 BC to Cornelia, the daughter of Marius's associate, Cinna, further confirmed him as a radical. When Lucius Cornelius Sulla, Marius's enemy and leader of the Optimates, was made dictator in 82 BC, he issued a list of enemies to be executed. Although Caesar was not harmed, he was ordered by Sulla to divorce Cornelia. Refusing that order, he found it prudent to leave Rome. He did not return to the city until 78 BC, after Sulla's resignation. Caesar was now 22 years old. Unable to gain office, he left Rome again and went to Rhodes, where he studied rhetoric; he returned to Rome in 73 BC, a very persuasive speaker. The year before, while still absent, he had been elected to the pontificate, an important college of Roman priests. In 71 BC Pompey the Great, who had earned his epithet in service under Sulla, returned to Rome, having defeated the rebellious Populares general Sertorius in Spain. At the same time Marcus Licinius Crassus, a rich patrician, suppressed the slave revolt in Italy led by Spartacus. Pompey and Crassus both ran for the consulship?an office held by two men?in 70 BC. Pompey, who by this time had changed sides, was technically ineligible, but with Caesar's help he won the office. Crassus became the other consul. In 69 BC, Caesar was elected quaestor and in 65 BC he was in charge of public events, gaining great popularity for his lavish gladiatorial games. To pay for these, he borrowed money from Crassus. This united the two men, who also found common cause with Pompey. When Caesar returned to Rome in 60 BC after a year as governor of Spain, he joined forces with Crassus and Pompey in a three-way alliance known as the First Triumvirate; to cement their relationship further, Caesar gave his daughter Julia to Pompey in marriage. Thus backed, Caesar was elected consul for 59BC despite Optimate hostility, and the year after (58 BC) he was appointed governor of Roman Gaul. At that time Celtic Gaul, to the north, was still independent, but the Aedui, a tribe of Roman allies, appealed to Caesar for help against another Gallic people, the Helvetii, during the first year of his governorship. Caesar marched into Celtic Gaul with six legions, defeated the Helvetii, and forced them to return to their home area. Next, he crushed Germanic forces under Ariovistus (flourished about 71-58 BC). By 57 BC, following the defeat of the Nervii, Rome was in control of northern Gaul. (A last revolt of the Gauls, led by Vercingetorix, was suppressed in 52 BC.) While Caesar was in Gaul, his agents attempted to dominate politics in Rome. This, however, threatened Pompey's position, and it became necessary for the triumvirs to arrange a meeting at Luca in 56 BC, which brought about a temporary reconciliation. It was decided that Caesar would continue in Gaul for another five years, while Pompey and Crassus would both be consuls for 55 BC; after that, each would have proconsular control of provinces. Caesar then went off to raid Britain and put down a revolt in Gaul. Crassus, ever eager for military glory, went to his post in Syria. Provoking a war with the Parthian Empire, he was defeated and killed at Carrhae in 53 BC. This removed the last buffer between Caesar and Pompey; their family ties had been broken by the death of Julia in 54 BC. In 52 BC, with Crassus out of the way, Pompey was made sole consul. Combined with his other powers, this gave him a formidable position. Jealous of his younger rival, he determined to break Caesar's power, an objective that could not be achieved without first depriving him of his command in Gaul. In order to protect himself, Caesar suggested that